The Earths temperature is like watching paint dry. It has changed by 0.6 degrees in 100 years if you believe the normally inaccurate UN IPCC or by 0.2 to 0.4 degrees if you believe others.

Que.1. Can I ask the 'experts' here how that equals "scorched Earth" and "the Planet has a fever" please?

CO2 levels have always followed temperature change (well for the past 700,000yrs anyway!). The lag is 400 to 1,400yrs behind previous warmings.

Que.2. Could the current high CO2 levels be related to our warming since the mini ice age 800yrs ago? 

CO2 levels have increased by 30% in the past 10 years but temperature has changed by 0.00 degrees in those past 10 years.

Que.3. Has CO2 gone on holiday or is this very clear proof CO2 is not a temperature driver?

The worlds CO2 cycle is dominated by natural, not man made, cycles. The oceans absorb CO2 (scribs from the atmosphere) in polar oceans and expels the CO2 back into the atmosphere in warmer oceans.

Que.4. Has anyone here, an expert, heard of the 'Solubility Pump' and the solubility of CO2 in liquid?

If man can change the Earths temperature as the greens and politicians claim can:

Que.5. Would it be better to have a temperature 2 degrees warmer than today or 2 degress colder - please detail why it benefits 

a). man - it would be better to be 2 degrees hotter/colder (delete one) because....

b). plants - it would be better to be 2 degrees hotter/colder (delete one) because....

c). animals - it would be better to be 2 degrees hotter/colder (delete one) because....

The IPCC and greens claim man is 'responsiible' for high CO2 levels. Please detail the quantities of CO2 from

i). Man - Output =  ???tons per year

2). Plants - Output =  ???tons per year Sink - ???tones per year

3). Oceans - Output = ???tones per year  Sink = ???tones per year

4). Other (ie. volcanos) Output =  ???tons per year

 5). The primary source for the increase in CO2 is due to man/natural sources (delete one)